![]() ![]() Naturally, many SMEs are adopting this alternative which is a major threat for The Global SAN Market. NAS servers can be accessed through TCP/IP linkage in graphical user interface mode and require fewer IT professionals for its management and configuration. Resulting from the high expenses associated with the technology, many potential consumers are opting for NAS storage instead of SAN. This price barrier has allowed the following two SAN alternatives to gain some major headway in data storage industry. iSCSI Storage Area Network solutions provide an alternative, but their performance is simply not as good. Combined, these expenses amount to a prohibitively high investment for startups and SMEs. In addition, FC SAN solution requires skilled specialists to resolve network-related issues resulting in an additional cost. The market’s most dominant and efficient technology, FC SAN requires the purchase of an FC HBA to assist each attached host. Storage Area Network, a network formed by connecting storage devices like disks, disk arrays, and tapes to a shared server provides exactly that.ĭespite such high growth potential however, The Storage Area Network Market is curtailed by one issue…its price tag. With more and more companies growing bigger and going global, there is an immense scalable data storage solution. ![]() The main reason for this growth is the rapid increase in enterprise data and need for improved security that follows. In the past few years revenues have been increasing at an unprecedented rate, prompting us to forecast a leap in the market’s current net worth of US$ 15.58 billion, to US$ 21.53 billion by 2016. TechNavio’s research team has been observing The Global Storage Area Network Market with a keen eye, and we’ve noted some very positive trends. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |